@eric_G
I’d definitely think we should pursuit the first book-like hedgehog. I have just a few points:
Could you maybe remove the spray paint effect on #16?
Maybe we could replace it with a gradiant?
I think your first nose design was better than the current one.
The logo looked more like a pen with the old nose, which I think is a great aesthetic for a collaborative note taking tool.
Great stuff, all of you.
Just because I like the heart-shape so much: @eric_G: How would a full circle like in #17 with the (fully) heart shaped face look like? Would you be so kind to make me a draft?
I think it’s time to decide which logo idea we should pursue.
Please vote below which of the suggestions you find most appealing. You can give each of them one to five points. The poll will close in one week. Please note that the poll is not for choosing the final look, but just the idea. We will probably iterate a bit before choosing a final design.
Looks like we got a nice result here I think that was a good first iteration and thanks to everyone who handed in crafts and ideas. Now we should go for the second round where we try to polish the logo with the most votes. But obviously new ideas are still possible in the next iteration. So those who want to polish their own version and put it out there again, are free to do that, too.
If you are short on time or similar let us know so we can try to figure something out. Would be a shame to lose an awesome logo draft just because one has a busy week.
Anyway, again thanks to everyone participating, in both, the design of logos and the selection. You make a big difference in the community and I look forward to your future contributions
I think I like the variant of @eric_G that @mrdrogdrog did, the best. The gradient works much better than the spray effect.
I think some variants we could try from there:
a more heartshaped face, therefore more of the body would be visible, but as @mrdrogdrog mentioned we have the curve / straight line colliding then
the round version, but I‘m not sure what we could do with the lower body. It currently is a bit bare. Maybe we could use this logo as a rolling progress indicator?
To answer your direction question from the chat: I prefer the V form. I actually like that it’s not a perfect circle, it gives the logo more character. The pencil look is also nice.
I don’t think the unconected white face in black-white is problematic, thanks to the nose being there i don’t miss the “line” there. (Maybe try just adding a thin black line at the face’s edge in black and white only?)
I disagree on the nose popping out looking too cartoonish, I think it looks much cuter.
I also have to disagree with @mrdrogdrog, I prefer the round heart/face shape.
So in summary, this version with the “old”, protruding nose would probably be my favorite.
The first idea I have when I see this is, that there is an opportunity for interaction between the… hedge…pen…doc… (I dunno. we should find a name for our mascot. I still like Cody ) and the text.
As you already said he seems to finish drawing the d.
I think there is a chance to design the text itself.
EDIT:
I searched around on google fonts and found (again) pacifico. It would fit the “the pen writes something” idea… But I don’t think that it’s a good idea. Too playful. )
It should easy to print and should be easy to make sticker
Now a days making embroidery on t-shirts and bags are common. So lines should have enough thickness to accommodate three or four threads
If possible, friendly enough for press cutting of metal sheets.
Also should be able to maintain the identity while seen at very small size like on browser tab
Just a suggestion. This may be applicable to all type of logos, but for Free Software it is essential. In general, in a free software software project the fair use policy on logo can support the promotion of project, but the policy will be really useful, only if the logo is usable.
Isn’t the 6.2 proposal going in this direction, @Sooraj_Kenoth? I’m sure there can be variants and adaptations for various materials.
6.2 looks great!
I still think that, although 6.2 can make a great icon, the HedgeDoc logo should be flexible, in the sense that I’d love to see this mascot around, playing with documents, or being a pencil, etc. But I dislike the “variant” version which I find too sharp on the face – although after looking at it in context (with the logotype) it makes sense.
I’m a bit afraid of the regularity of the spikes, maybe some wind could come into play